Advancing Neuro-Oncology in Indonesia: Lessons from a Multidisciplinary Tumor Board at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital

Clicks: 19
ID: 329957
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #23 of 65 articles by views in Neuro-Oncology Practice

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Background In neuro-oncology, particularly for complex cases managed within resource-constrained health systems, multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) are fundamental to coordinated care. The Neuro-Oncology Meeting (NOM) at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta has operated for over 15 years, without formal performance evaluation. This study assessed NOM functions in practice and to pinpoint aspects that could be strengthened. Methods A mixed-methods design was applied from October through December 2025 combining a retrospective review of cases from the NOM database over the preceding decade with an online questionnaire and focused group discussion (FGD) among specialists from neurology, neurosurgery, radiology, pathology, radiation oncology, and psychiatry. Responses and transcripts were then subjected to thematic analysis to delineate key performance domains. Results Brain tumors comprised the majority of cases (69%), followed by spinal tumors (20.3%). Common presenting symptoms included headache, motor deficits, and decreased consciousness. Over half of primary brain tumor cases lacked a definitive diagnosis at discussion. The FGD identified recurring challenges: absence of standardized case selection criteria, inadequate subspecialist representation for complex cases, lengthy presentations, inefficient handling of guideline-concordant cases, fragmented follow-up documentation, administrative constraints, and declining engagement during prolonged virtual sessions. Conclusions The NOM remains essential for neuro-oncology care within a high-volume referral centre, yet workflow improvements are needed. Case stratification, concise presentation formats, consistent specialist attendance, electronic medical record (EMR)-integrated documentation, hybrid meeting models, and stricter time management could strengthen multidisciplinary practice in Indonesia and similar low- and middle- income settings.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214506837 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Tiara Aninditha, Irma Savitri Madjid, Henry Riyanto Sofyan, Ahmad Rafi Faiq, Aditya Putra, Putri Azzahra Nur Azrina, Nadya Salsabila Elkarasjzi, Teguh Asaad Suhatno Ranakusuma, Maciej M Mrugala
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Neuro-Oncology Practice
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/nop/npag092
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npag092
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.