Participatory Approaches with Older Adults in Technology and Innovation Research: A Scoping Review of Reviews

Clicks: 18
ID: 329951
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #91 of 184 articles by views in the gerontologist

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 184 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Compared to other age groups, older adults are often marginalized in the design processes of digital technologies leading to digital and social exclusion. While these aspects have been discussed in several reviews, an overarching perspective on how older adults are involved in Participatory Approaches (PA) in technology and innovation development is currently missing. This scoping review of reviews provides an overarching view on the narratives, trends, and gaps in PA in different fields of innovation, and proposes future research and practice directions. The study followed the Arksey & O'Malley's protocol for scoping reviews and the PRISMA-ScR checklist as the reporting guideline. Seven databases were screened for studies with a thematic focus on older adults, applying PA in technology and technology-related innovation, and published between 2014-2024. Twenty-two reviews were included. PA with older adults have seemingly evolved over the years with an increased focus on values equity, empowerment, power-sharing, and mutual learning. Nevertheless, deficit narratives on aging and ageism still constrain meaningful participation. A "participation gap" persists in which: terminology remains inconsistent; older adults are predominantly assigned roles of informants or testers rather than co-designers or equal partners; methods are mainly data-extractive; marginalized subgroups remain systematically underrepresented; and the technology scope remains predominantly care-centric. Identified gaps highlight the need for standardizing meaningful participation by creating a seal of quality for participatory approaches, improved reporting, and stronger inclusion of underrepresented populations and life domains of older persons.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214399066 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ittay Mannheim, Anna Urbaniak, Eleanor Bantry-White, Unmil Karadkar, Krzysztof Klincewicz, Alexander Bajwa Kucharski, Arlind Reuter, Rogério T. Ribeiro, Willeke van Staalduinen, P J White, Magdalena Zatorska
Journal the gerontologist
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/geront/gnag229
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnag229
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.