Transition from Paediatric to Adult Congenital Heart Disease Care in Central and South- Eastern Europe: Current Practices and Opportunities for Improvement

Clicks: 18
ID: 329894
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #23 of 80 articles by views in European Heart Journal Open

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Aims Transition from paediatric to adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) care is a critical determinant of lifelong disease management for individuals with CHD. However, structured transition programmes remain inconsistently implemented, and data are lacking on current practices in Central and South-Eastern European (CESEE) countries. This study aims to evaluate existing transition practices across CESEE and to identify opportunities to improve the development and implementation of structured programmes. Methods An online questionnaire was distributed to centres involved in congenital heart disease care across CESEE countries. The survey assessed centre characteristics, transition services, transfer processes, and development priorities. Responses from 60 healthcare CHD professionals representing 43 centres in 21 countries were analysed. Results A formal ACHD service was reported in 29 of 43 centres (67%), mostly established after the year 2000 (72%), caring for a median of 1,500 (IQR 782 - 4000) ACHD patients. Overall, only 10 (23%) centres reported having a formal transition programme. Transition counselling was typically delivered in a single outpatient visit, commonly involving paediatric and adult CHD physicians, but rarely nurses and psychosocial professionals (20% each). Structured transfer processes were inconsistently implemented, only half of centres monitored non-attendance at initial adult visits. In centres without formal programmes, informal counselling largely occurred at the final paediatric or first adult visit, relying on patient self-referral, and lacking follow-up. Conclusions Formal transition programmes remain limited across CESEE ACHD centres. Standardised clear pathways, investment in dedicated transition clinics, and trained workforce, are needed to improve continuity of care for adolescents with CHD.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214448211 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Alexandra Arvanitaki, Katja Prokšelj, Iveta Šimková, Irena Ivanac Vranešić, Agnese Strenge, Monika Komar, Magdalena Lipczyńska, Anna Kaneva-Nencheva, Lina Gumbienė, Petra Antonova, Hajnalka Olga Balint, Ioan Mircea Coman, Ümit Yaşar Si̇nan, Maryanne Caruana, Aleksandra Nikolić, Maarja Maser, Elena Panfile, Margarita Bartsota, Elizabeta Srbinovska Kostovska, George A. Giannakoulas, Tamara Kovačević-Preradović, Gani Bajraktari, Pencho Kratunkov, Lidia Tomkiewicz-Pajak, Yu.I. Klymyshyn, Ihor Lebid, Michael A Gatzoulis, Margarita Brida
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal European Heart Journal Open
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ehjopen/oeag144
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeag144
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.