Digital Technology–Enabled Healthcare Services and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Clicks: 16
ID: 329780
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #39 of 80 articles by views in European Heart Journal Open

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background and Aims Digital technology–enabled healthcare services may support secondary prevention in patients with cardiovascular disease; however, their effects on clinical outcomes remain uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate their impact on cardiovascular outcomes. Methods PubMed and Embase were searched from inception to March 11, 2025. Randomized controlled trials evaluating digital technology–enabled healthcare services in patients with established cardiovascular disease were included. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), as defined in each trial. Secondary outcomes included rehospitalization, coronary artery disease–related events, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, revascularization, and adverse events. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251186138). Results Among 3,603 records identified, 14 randomized controlled trials were included. Digital technology–enabled healthcare services were associated with a reduced risk of MACCE (risk ratio 0.595; 95% confidence interval 0.471–0.752; I2 = 0%). Rehospitalization (risk ratio 0.676; 95% confidence interval 0.496–0.923; I2 = 73.9%) and coronary artery disease–related events (risk ratio 0.594; 95% confidence interval 0.354–0.996; I2 = 0%) were also reduced. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, or revascularization (all I2 = 0%). No significant difference in adverse events was observed between groups (I2 = 45.9%). Conclusions Digital technology–enabled healthcare services were associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events in patients with established cardiovascular disease. However, substantial heterogeneity was observed for rehospitalization, and no significant reductions were observed in mortality outcomes.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214355825 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal European Heart Journal Open
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ehjopen/oeag156
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.