Effect of Institutional Guidelines on Equitable Management of Pediatric Osteomyelitis

Clicks: 18
ID: 329671
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #47 of 145 articles by views in journal of the pediatric infectious diseases society

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 145 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Background Acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (AHO) in children requires timely diagnosis and multidisciplinary management to optimize outcomes. Clinical practice guidelines aim to standardize care and reduce variation; however, their impact on health equity is not well understood. We evaluated whether implementation of institutional AHO guidelines improved care delivery and reduced disparities in sociodemographic groups. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children aged 90 days to 18 years hospitalized with AHO at a tertiary care children’s hospital. Patients were stratified into pre- (September 1, 2014-July 31, 2017) and post-guideline implementation (November 1, 2017-December 31, 2023) periods. Care processes included blood culture acquisition, laboratory testing, imaging use and timing, bone biopsy, administration of any antibiotics, administration of appropriate empiric antibiotics, number of inpatient Pediatric Infectious Diseases (PID) consult visits, and Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery involvement. Outcomes were compared across demographic variables including race, ethnicity, preferred language, sex, age, and Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Results 131 patients were included (35 pre-implementation, 96 post-implementation). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Following guideline implementation, rate of appropriate empiric antibiotic administration increased (79.1% vs. 37.1%, p<0.001) and median number of inpatient PID consult visits increased (3 vs. 2, p=0.039). Across the full cohort, patients from higher-deprivation neighborhoods were less likely to have blood cultures obtained (70.8% high ADI vs. 94.5% low ADI, p=0.008). Black children had fewer PID consult visits (median 1 vs. 3 in other race groups, p<0.001) as did children from high-ADI neighborhoods (median 2 vs. 3 in other ADI groups, p=0.001). These disparities persisted in the post-implementation period. Conclusions Implementation of an institutional AHO guideline increased appropriate empiric antibiotic use and PID subspecialty involvement but did not eliminate disparities in care delivery. Persistent differences by race and socioeconomic status highlight the need for equity-focused implementation strategies to ensure consistent, high-quality care for all children.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214192378 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Timothy Schurz, Cheyney C. Dobson, Gary L Freed, William E Gillespie, Niko Kaciroti, Harlan McCaffery, Jason B Weinberg, Elizabeth C Lloyd
Journal journal of the pediatric infectious diseases society
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jpids/piag103
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piag103
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.