Conformational exceptions in glycoside hydrolase reactivity

Clicks: 21
ID: 329670
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #32 of 61 articles by views in glycobiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Glycoside hydrolases (GHs) accelerate glycosidic bond cleavage by coupling active-site architecture, the geometry required for substitution at the anomeric center, and the conformational landscape of the −1 sugar. This coupling is often summarized as family-dependent conformational itineraries that connect Michaelis complexes to oxocarbenium-ion-like transition states (and, for retaining enzymes, to covalent intermediates). However, crystallographic snapshots sometimes reveal complexes in which the −1 sugar remains close to a ground-state-like 4C₁ chair or adopts noncanonical puckers such as E₅. In this Review, we reassess such observations within a cautious physical-organic framework. Here, “exception” is used in a mechanistic rather than statistical sense: the aim is to document and interpret departures from the conformational behaviour expected from accepted stereochemistry itinerary relationships, not to estimate the relative abundance of such cases in the Protein Data Bank. Chair-like 4C₁ complexes should not be interpreted as evidence for a new transition-state geometry; rather, they may represent recognition or pre-reactive minima in which catalytic residues are positioned near C1 but additional late, transient, or ensemble distortion is still required to reach an in-line, oxocarbenium-ion-like transition state. We further discuss how metal coordination and active-site constraints in α-mannosidases can stabilize alternative pre-reactive basins—exemplified by E₅ complexes in GH38 and GH92—while preserving access to transition-state-competent regions. Finally, we outline how structural descriptors, on-enzyme dynamics, and intrinsic quantum-mechanical “preactivation” indices can help distinguish genuinely productive noncanonical states from crystallographic ground-state snapshots.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214190668 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Santiago Alonso‐Gil
Journal glycobiology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/glycob/cwag082
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.