A cognitive architecture for Long COVID: the interplay of brain fog, fatigue, attention and memory

Clicks: 48
ID: 329641
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #14 of 194 articles by views in Brain communications

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 194 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract The cognitive mechanisms underlying post-acute COVID-19 sequelae (“Long COVID”) remain poorly defined. While deficits in memory and executive function are well-documented, it is unclear whether these arise from primary neural dysfunction or are secondary consequences of fatigue related factors. Here, we addressed this in a community cohort (N = 24,095) using a custom cognitive battery to dissect the interplay between sustained attention, fatigue, and memory. Among this subset, 11,925 participants had previously tested positive for COVID-19, and 548 reported ongoing symptoms consistent with Long COVID. Path analysis (structural equation modelling) was used to evaluate competing mechanistic models linking COVID-19-related features (e.g., duration of symptoms, severity of illness) with objective performance and subjective cognitive symptoms. Participants with persistent symptoms post COVID-19 (unresolved beyond 12 weeks) showed significant deficits in sustained attention compared to non-infected individuals. Path models revealed complex relationships underlying these deficits. Unlike models of mental health disorders and general ageing, where cognitive performance was largely mediated by relationships to fatigue, the final Long COVID model represented a hybrid mechanism: COVID-19 features were associated with direct, independent effects on attention and memory, while simultaneously relating lower cognitive performance to on-task fatigue buildup. Findings also suggest that 'brain fog' reflects a distinct neurocognitive vulnerability associated with fatigue and reduced performance on sustained attention and memory tasks. These findings accord with the hypothesis that Long COVID has a heterogeneous, multi-faceted impact on cognitive function, with higher-order processes such as memory being particularly vulnerable due to their dependence on foundational attention and motivation processes.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214239106 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Darragh Higgins, Sijia Zhao, Masud Husain, Peter Denno, Peter John Hellyer, William R. Trender, Christina Joanne Atchison, Bethan Davies, Emily Cooper, Joshua Elliott, Matt Whitaker, Chiara Di Gravio, Marc Chadeau‐Hyam, Paul Elliott, Helen Ward, Adam Hampshire
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Brain communications
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/braincomms/fcag361
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcag361
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.