Body size and cranial shape differentiation in urban and rural house mice ( Mus musculus domesticus )

Clicks: 27
ID: 329632
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #23 of 43 articles by views in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Cities are characterized by elevated temperatures, increased pollution, and high-density human populations which often are accompanied by changes in available resources. These shifts have the potential to drive phenotypic divergence in urban wildlife. Functional morphological traits, like body size, can mediate interactions between wildlife and habitat and are closely tied to life history and fitness. While examples of functional morphological variation associated with urbanization are increasing, variation in such traits as a response to urbanization remains unexplored for most taxa. Here, we investigated morphological divergence between urban and rural populations of house mice (Mus musculus domesticus). House mice are globally distributed in diverse habitats and are a model system with a wealth of phenotypic data, making them useful for the study of the impacts of urbanization on morphology. Using a paired replicate design, we sampled urban and rural populations in three distinct metropolitan regions in the eastern United States. We found that body size was smaller in urban populations. Using 3D geometric morphometrics, we also analyzed variation in cranial shape across habitats. Differences in cranial shape were largely allometric, that is, driven by differences in body size. However, we also uncovered evidence of cranial shape variation between habitats not explained by size. In contrast, we did not find evidence for habitat-driven differences in cranial capacity independent of size. Overall, our results suggest a key role for body size in mediating morphological responses to urbanization and highlight the potential of house mice as a globally distributed model for urbanization.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214221742 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Stephen C. Kupchella, Anne E. Kort, Megan Phifer‐Rixey
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/iob/obag057
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obag057
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.