Governing Critical Minerals for a Just Energy Transition in ASEAN: Insights from the EU

Clicks: 10
ID: 329437
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #5 of 8 articles by views in Oxford Open Climate Change

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract This article examines the governance of critical minerals through the lens of a just energy transition in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in the context of accelerating climate action and the global transition to low-carbon energy systems. As countries expand renewable energy technologies to address climate change, demand for critical minerals is increasing rapidly. However, their extraction and processing raise significant environmental, social, and human rights concerns, particularly in regions with evolving governance frameworks. The study analyses ASEAN’s legal and institutional capacity to address these challenges and support a just energy transition. The research adopts the JUST framework as its theoretical foundation, combined with an interpretative functional approach to comparative law and policy analysis. It draws on the European Union’s Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) and related instruments as a benchmark, given their relatively comprehensive integration of supply security, sustainability, and justice considerations. The analysis identifies key gaps in ASEAN’s governance approach, including fragmented institutional structures, limited integration of human rights protections, and insufficient coordination across energy, mining, and environmental frameworks. The findings highlight the need for a coordinated regional framework for critical minerals, supported by clearer definitions, strategic project development, and stronger alignment with existing ASEAN instruments. The article also emphasises embedding human rights, environmental safeguards, and governance measures across all relevant policies. Such a justice-oriented framework would help ASEAN navigate the energy transition while advancing the Paris Agreement’s recognition of the imperatives of a just transition and climate action that respects human rights, and equity.
Reference Key
openalex_W7214006200 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Oxford Open Climate Change
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oxfclm/kgag009
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.