Vitamin D Supplementation and Melanoma Incidence and Recurrence: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Clicks: 7
ID: 329233
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
1.8
/100
7 views
6 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #202 of 216 articles by views in clinical and experimental dermatology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 216 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Vitamin D has been hypothesized to influence melanoma risk and progression, but observational findings are confounded by ultraviolet exposure. Objectives To assess the effect of vitamin D supplementation on melanoma recurrence and melanoma incidence using randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence. Methods A PRISMA-guided systematic review and meta-analysis identified RCTs evaluating oral vitamin D supplementation, with or without calcium, reporting melanoma incidence or recurrence. Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled for recurrence and relative risks (RRs) for incidence using random-effects models with the Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman (HKSJ) correction. Results Five RCTs including 56,901 participants met inclusion criteria. Vitamin D supplementation was not associated with reduced melanoma recurrence (pooled HR 1.23; 95% CI 0.29–5.18; HKSJ-adjusted) or melanoma incidence (pooled RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.71–1.24; HKSJ-adjusted). Findings were consistent across varied dosing regimens and follow-up durations. Limitations Melanoma was a secondary endpoint in some trials, event rates were low, and dosing regimens varied. Conclusions Current randomized evidence does not support vitamin D supplementation as a strategy to reduce melanoma incidence or recurrence.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7213965914
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Christian Roberti, Savannah Chapman, Hannah Jenkins, John Paul Lemchak, Margaret Mueller |
| Journal | clinical and experimental dermatology |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/ced/llag418
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.