Burn Photographs: Can Burn Nurses Capture High-Quality Burn Wound Photographs? A Pilot Study

Clicks: 25
ID: 329110
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #35 of 87 articles by views in journal of burn care & research : official publication of the american burn association

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Burn wound photographs have become essential to multidisciplinary burn teams and improve patient care overall. This retrospective single-center chart review was conducted at an American Burn Association-verified burn center to evaluate the quality of burn wound photographs obtained by burn nurses who had received 1-hour basic clinical photography instruction. The quality of 15 burn wound photographs taken by burn nurses was judged by 3 skilled photographers using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very poor, 2 = poor, 3 = average, 4 = good, and 5 = excellent) to evaluate key components of high-quality burn photography, including appropriate orientation, decent leveling, lack of a disruptive background, proper framing, and quality lighting. The proportions of photographs meeting at least average quality standards (a Likert score of ≥3) for the five evaluated components were 93.2%, 82.1%, 82.3%, 82.2%, and 86.7%, respectively. This suggests that when formal clinical photography instruction is given to burn nurses, standardized techniques are applied during image capture, resulting in high-quality, reproducible burn wound photographs used to augment clinical care, communication, and documentation.
Reference Key
openalex_W7213558132 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Chiaka Akarichi, Prisha Jonnalagadda, K Bosler, Rebecca Coffey
Journal journal of burn care & research : official publication of the american burn association
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jbcr/irag167
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.