A cost-efficient data-driven framework for rail temperature prediction and thermal buckling risk assessment

Clicks: 10
ID: 329042
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #8 of 10 articles by views in Intelligent Transportation Infrastructure

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract High rail temperatures compromise the integrity of continuously welded rail (CWR), generating compressive forces that may trigger track buckling. This study proposes a cost-effective, data-driven framework for rail temperature prediction using only two measured inputs, ambient temperature and relative humidity, both routinely measured by standard meteorological stations, together with temporal features obtained from the timestamp. No solar radiation, wind or cloud cover sensor is required, thus avoiding complex sensor arrays. The prediction is converted into the axial thermal stress governing buckling, the quantity used in track engineering. Five machine learning algorithms were benchmarked: Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTM), and XGBoost. Two strategies were evaluated: a long-term global model on a two-year dataset, and a short-term sliding-window model predicting up to three hours ahead. Models were trained on measurements from an active Brazilian freight railway (2022–2023) and validated on the temporally separate January to May 2024 window, the period of maximum buckling exposure. Hyperparameters were optimized via Optuna using a Tree-structured Parzen Estimator. ANN delivered the lowest long-term error ($R^{2}$ = 0.946; MAE = 1.54 $^{\circ }$C), followed closely by SVR ($R^{2}$ = 0.941; MAE = 1.63 $^{\circ }$C), while SVR achieved the best short-term precision at the one-hour horizon ($R^{2}$ = 0.949; MAE = 1.09 $^{\circ }$C, with RF closely following at MAE = 1.10 $^{\circ }$C). Expressed as rail axial stress, these errors correspond to about 3.67 and 2.59 MPa, roughly 7.7% and 5.5% of the compression developed by a 20 $^{\circ }$C excess over the neutral temperature. Despite the limited inputs, the framework achieves competitive accuracy, a practical solution for sparsely monitored networks.
Reference Key
openalex_W7213532856 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Intelligent Transportation Infrastructure
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/iti/liag016
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.