Telehealth to Reduce Compound Pressures on the NHS and Social Care: A Multi-Methods Study Protocol

Clicks: 18
ID: 329005
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #4 of 17 articles by views in Oxford Open Digital Health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Telehealth and remote monitoring are increasingly used in the management of long-term health conditions and can improve access to care. The Mersey Care Telehealth Service (MCTS) provides technology-enabled support for people with heart failure, diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The service has been operating for over a decade; however, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to its rapid expansion. This study aims to gather evidence on the impact of the MCTS, explore barriers and enablers to effective service delivery and evaluate its cost-effectiveness. This study comprises of four work packages (WP). WP1: A retrospective observational analysis to evaluate whether the MCTS is associated with reduced unplanned healthcare utilisation and to examine how outcomes vary by sociodemographic characteristics and service delivery type; WP2: Longitudinal analyses to compare patient-reported outcomes, including mental health, quality of life and wellbeing, between telehealth users and a comparator group of non-users who meet the eligibility criteria for telehealth; WP3: Remote semi-structured interviews with MCTS staff and patients will be held to explore the barriers and enablers influencing the effective service delivery; WP4: An economic evaluation will determine whether the MCTS is cost-effective compared with usual care, and will assess how cost-effectiveness varies by patient characteristics and service delivery type. This multi-method evaluation will provide robust and comprehensive evidence of the impact, equitable delivery, implementation approach, and cost-effectiveness of the MCTS. Insights seek to inform service improvement, commissioning decisions, and future telehealth strategy within the NHS.
Reference Key
openalex_W7213544728 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Oxford Open Digital Health
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oodh/oqag032
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.