Antiemetic-Associated QT Prolongation: A Clinical Review and Risk-Stratified Prescribing Framework for Long QT Syndrome

Clicks: 9
ID: 328843
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #40 of 48 articles by views in European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Background and Aims Nausea and vomiting accompany pregnancy, gastroenteritis, migraine, the perioperative period, and cytotoxic chemotherapy, and antiemetics are among the most frequently prescribed drugs worldwide. Several antiemetic classes delay ventricular repolarization and prolong the QT interval, a substrate for torsades de pointes (TdP), ventricular fibrillation, and sudden cardiac death. We synthesized the evidence on antiemetic QT liability and translated it into a three-tier, risk-stratified prescribing framework and stepwise clinical algorithm for patients with inherited or acquired long QT syndrome (LQTS) and other torsadogenic risk factors. Methods We conducted a narrative review of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and pharmacovigilance sources (FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, CredibleMeds/QTdrugs) through early 2026, prioritizing mechanistic studies, randomized comparisons, disproportionality analyses, and consensus statements on antiemetic QT liability and LQTS management. Results QT prolongation across antiemetic classes is driven principally by IKr blockade (hERG/KCNH2). Risk is highly heterogeneous within classes: in a 2026 FAERS disproportionality analysis, ondansetron carried a substantially stronger QT-related signal than olanzapine (reporting odds ratio 27.2 vs 8.7), consistent with its dose-dependent effect among 5-HT3 antagonists, which prompted a 2012 FDA restriction on the 32 mg intravenous dose; palonosetron has minimal effect. Neurokinin-1 antagonists, low-risk antihistamines, anticholinergics, and 5-HT4 agonists carry little QT liability, while butyrophenones, phenothiazines, and promethazine carry greater risk. Serious events cluster in patients with electrolyte disturbance, bradycardia, polypharmacy, or underlying LQTS, particularly when QTc exceeds 500 ms or rises more than 60 ms from baseline. Conclusions Antiemetic-associated arrhythmia is largely preventable. Structured risk assessment, electrolyte correction, ECG monitoring, and a stepwise selection strategy favouring agents with minimal QT liability allow clinicians to manage nausea and vomiting safely, even in high-risk populations.
Reference Key
openalex_W7213403076 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ahmed T. Moustafa, Omar Dabash, Pradosh Kumar Panigrahi, Habib Khan
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ehjcvp/pvag077
URL
https://academic.oup.com/ehjcvp/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvag077/71130347/pvag077.pdf
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.