How Do Scottish Farmers Approach Change and What Does This Mean for Future Decisions?

Clicks: 8
ID: 328644
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #11 of 12 articles by views in Q Open

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Understanding farmers’ orientation toward change can inform policies supporting adaptation and sustainability. This study examines Scottish farmers’ self-reported orientation toward change and its associations with farmer characteristics, stated intentions and engagement in sustainable practices. Data were drawn from 981 respondents randomly selected to complete an orientation toward change module within the 2023 Farmer Intentions Survey. Thirteen farm-specific items adapted from Oreg’s Resistance to Change Scale were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and combined into a change-cautious orientation (CCO) index. Regression and group-comparison models assessed associations between CCO and respondent characteristics, intentions and practices. The items reflected two dimensions, discomfort with change and cognitive rigidity. Farmers exhibited moderate CCO, with scores concentrated near the scale midpoint, indicating neither strong change caution nor strong openness across the sample. Respondents identifying as business persons and those belonging to farmer groups reported lower CCO, while higher CCO was observed among crofters, hobbyists and smallholders, respondents aged 75 and over and those deriving more than three-quarters of household income from farming. Gender and climate perceptions were not significantly associated with CCO. Lower CCO was associated with intentions to increase technological investment and agri-environmental activity. Higher CCO was generally associated with lower engagement in several sustainable practices and lower adoption intensity, although associations differed across practices and farm types. Practice-specific associations appeared strongest among arable farms. The findings indicate that behavioural orientation should complement structural and economic factors when designing differentiated advisory and policy support.
Reference Key
openalex_W7213451457 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Q Open
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/qopen/qoag029
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.