Highly Contiguous Is Not Chromosomally Accurate: Integrated Cytogenetic and Genomic Mapping in Two Turtle Genome
Clicks: 11
ID: 328611
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
3.0
/100
11 views
10 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #33 of 65 articles by views in journal of heredity
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract High-quality genome assemblies are essential for robust research across biological and medical fields. Assembly errors can have far-reaching consequences for downstream analyses, including gene annotation and the inference of synteny. In contrast to the rapid growth of genomic data volume, there is a notable lag in the integration of chromosome-level assemblies with cytogenetic data. We conducted the first direct genome-to-genome comparison, integrating comparative chromosome painting, the alignment of chromosome-specific probes to available genome assemblies, and synteny-based comparison of independent chromosome-level assemblies of the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta, 2n = 56) and the red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans, 2n = 50). Using two independent sets of flow-sorted chromosome-specific probes in cross-species hybridizations, together with the sequencing and mapping of chromosome-derived DNA libraries, we assigned assembled scaffolds to all physical chromosomes of both species. In C. caretta, chromosomal assignments and genome-wide synteny were fully consistent with the published assembly, except for the reduced sizes of two microchromosome scaffolds, which we attribute to under-representation of repetitive DNA. In contrast, in T. s. elegans, cytogenetic validation of the assemblies revealed a false rearrangement compared to a missed one. Our results show that even highly contiguous vertebrate genome assemblies can misrepresent chromosome structure. When cytogenetic analyses reveal such inaccuracies, updated reference genomes should be generated for widely studied species to enable accurate inference of karyotype evolution and downstream comparative genomic analyses.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7213441321
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Anastasia A. Proskuryakova, Katerina V. Tishakova, Maria Kulak, Arina Ilina, Sergey Marchenko, Lada Lisachova, G. I. Davletshina, Elena Shagimardanova, Alessio Iannucci, Vladimir A. Trifonov, Svetlana A. Romanenko |
| Journal | journal of heredity |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/jhered/esag079
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.