Diced Costal Cartilage Combined With Tissue Adhesive in Rhinoplasty: How I Do It and Why

Clicks: 16
ID: 328442
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #74 of 125 articles by views in Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 125 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Background Predictable dorsal augmentation remains challenging in rhinoplasty, particularly in revision and contracted nose deformities. Solid costal cartilage provides structural support but may be associated with warping, rigidity, and graft visibility, whereas diced cartilage offers greater contour adaptability. Objectives To describe a reproducible technique for dorsal augmentation using diced costal cartilage combined with tissue adhesive and to report clinical outcomes and complications in a large contemporary series. Methods Between 2022 and 2023, rhinoplasty using diced cartilage for dorsal augmentation was performed in 476 patients. Autologous costal cartilage or irradiated homologous costal cartilage (IHCC) was selected based on clinical indication. The technique emphasized meticulous graft preparation, precise pocket dissection, injectable placement, and postoperative external molding. Outcomes were evaluated through photographic documentation, physical examination, and patient feedback. Results Patient age ranged from 19 to 72 years, with more than 80% female patients. Approximately two-thirds were revision cases, and nearly three-fourths were classified as complicated. Among 298 patients with follow-up exceeding 6 months (mean, 10.5 months), no clinical evident graft warping, loss of dorsal height, or graft resorption was observed. Aesthetic outcomes were stable and predictable, with high patient satisfaction. Complications were infrequent and manageable with minimally invasive interventions. Conclusions With appropriate indications and refined technique, diced cartilage provides a versatile and reliable option for dorsal augmentation in both primary and revision rhinoplasty, offering a practical balance between structural support and contour flexibility.
Reference Key
openalex_W7212371987 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jin-Liang Lee, Ko-Chang Chang, Shih-Han Chen, Yen-Hao Chiu
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/asjof/ojag176
URL
https://academic.oup.com/asjopenforum/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/asjof/ojag176/71045105/ojag176.pdf
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.