Government Recommendations and Health Behaviours: Evidence from Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines

Clicks: 19
ID: 328377
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #147 of 295 articles by views in the economic journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 295 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract We provide novel evidence on how healthcare decision-making responds to government recommendations by examining the 2009 revision to the United States Preventive Services Task Force’s mammography guidelines. Using a difference-in-differences design, we find the revision reduced mammography among women aged 40–49 by 6–10%. We also find spillover effects among women aged 30–39, who became substantially less likely to receive mammogram recommendations or screenings, despite not being the guideline’s target population. Declines were greatest among groups with higher baseline screening rates. We also find evidence of reduced overdiagnosis of early-stage tumors and increased confusion about cancer prevention recommendations.
Reference Key
openalex_W7212712955 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal the economic journal
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ej/ueag110
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.