Patient and clinician perspectives on digital tools in heart failure: results in three London hospital networks (Qual-HF)

Clicks: 15
ID: 328346
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #55 of 80 articles by views in European Heart Journal - Digital Health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Aims There are limited data on the experience and perspectives of patients or clinicians about the use of digital tools ([DT] such as Internet resources, social media and smartphone Apps) in heart failure (HF). This study aimed to explore patient and clinician perspectives of DT use and provide insights into the factors that facilitate or obstruct such use. Methods and results This was a mixed-methods study using semi-structured interviews of 14 people living with HF and 9 clinicians working as HF specialists. Recorded interviews underwent thematic analysis. Three main themes emerged: ‘the dual nature of information’, the ‘recommendation gap’ and ‘self-care as a time-dependent behaviour’. Patients were generally fearful of information from DTs, with many disengaging from their use as a form of self-preservation. Patients described finding the ‘right’ information as a struggle and their behaviour appeared related to their level of digital health literacy and degree of activation. Recommendation of DT by clinicians was influenced by assumptions around the digital capability of patients, the lack of evidence-based guideline recommendations, and lack of a local or international consensus around the use of DT. Conclusion Many patients living with HF are anxious about online information and withdraw from using DTs. A clinician’s recommendation may help, providing an ‘information prescription’, but is limited by assumptions about patients and a lack of training, local consensus and clear international guidance. Routine assessment of digital capability, particularly in older patients, may balance some of these assumptions and support more consistent and equitable use.
Reference Key
openalex_W7212885926 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors K McBeath, J P Riley, Martín Cowie
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ehjdh/ztag146
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztag146
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.