Strengths and weaknesses of national confidential case reviews of maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality.

Clicks: 291
ID: 32829
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #10 of 20 articles by views in early human development

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Confidential case reviews have been established as a means to improve the quality of maternity care for several decades. Impacts of these programmes, while difficult to demonstrate, have been observed on maternal and neonatal mortality rates, maternity policy and clinical practice. At a national level, maternal and newborn case review programmes identify messages to improve care through multidisciplinary review of medical records of all, or a sample, of mothers and infants who have died or have a specific morbidity. The major strength of such national programmes is that they allow lessons to be identified to improve care at all levels of the health system from national government policy to individual clinical practice. However, strengthening translation of recommendations into action, whether through a more active link with implementation processes or further development of dissemination strategies grounded in implementation science, is an important continuing focus.
Reference Key
knight2019strengthsearly Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Knight, Marian;
Journal early human development
Year 2019
DOI
S0378-3782(19)30488-8
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.