Rebuilding Health and Human Services: A Call to Strategic Planning and Action

Clicks: 11
ID: 328270
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #135 of 168 articles by views in Health Affairs Scholar

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 168 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract The capacity of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has been substantially reduced since early 2025. This has included staffing cuts on a scale not seen in decades, delays in implementing billions of dollars in grants, and other disruptions to normal operations, all of which have received considerable public coverage and attention. To date, far less public attention has been given to rebuilding efforts. This commentary presents recommendations for rebuilding HHS’ lost capacity, following a series of roundtable discussions convened by a network of former senior HHS appointees. The roundtables included former HHS political appointees, career program staff and division leaders, and health policy researchers from universities, think tanks, and policy organizations. Based on common themes in these discussions, we propose five recommendations to rebuild HHS capacity: (1) treating and funding the rebuilding of federal health and health research capacity as an urgent national security priority; (2) shifting from reactive crisis management to coordinated forward planning; (3) continued documentation of what capacity has been lost and why; (4) establishing an independent, nonpartisan science advisory body across HHS; and (5) write new legislation now so that policy windows are not missed when they open.
Reference Key
openalex_W7212014332 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Health Affairs Scholar
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/haschl/qxag245
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.