Distinct and shared multimodal neuroimaging patterns in clinical frontotemporal dementia syndromes

Clicks: 16
ID: 328245
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #155 of 196 articles by views in Brain communications

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 196 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Clinical syndromes of frontotemporal dementia present both distinct and overlapping neuroimaging abnormalities and, consequently, domains of impairment. The aim of this study was to determine how well covariance patterns from multiple neuroimaging modalities discriminate across clinical frontotemporal dementia syndromes. Four-hundred participants with a clinical frontotemporal dementia diagnosis, including behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia, semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia, right temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia, primary progressive aphasia, apraxia of speech with agrammatic aphasia, primary progressive apraxia of speech, progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal syndrome, and 109 cognitively unimpaired participants underwent extensive neurological and neuropsychological assessments, structural MRI, flortaucipir-PET for tau and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-PET. Multimodal imaging covariance was investigated at the voxel-level using principal component analysis after adjusting for age and sex effects. Linear regression models were fit to investigate the relationship between principal components and clinical scores. Multinomial logistic regression models investigated the ability of imaging principal components to discriminate across syndromes. The first principal component, which describes the largest source of variability in the data, was a pattern of widespread cortical atrophy (21% variability explained) and of frontoparietal and temporal hypometabolism (21%): scores were lowest in behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia and correlated with general cognitive impairment. On tau-PET, the first principal component (43% variability) was not significantly different among syndromes and captured a widespread cortical tau uptake, with a focus on the temporal lobe. In all three modalities, the second principal component captured temporal lobe imaging abnormalities, contrasting the motor and semantic clinical syndromes. Subsequent components described smaller variability. On cross-validation, the classifiers based on principal components from MRI (multiclass area under the receiver operating characteristic: 0.76) and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET (0.79) outperformed tau-PET (0.71), while combining all three modalities did not significantly improve the classifier performance. On cross-validation, the sensitivity of the image-based classifiers was heterogeneous across syndromes and modalities, with highest values for progressive supranuclear palsy and semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia and lowest for primary progressive aphasia and corticobasal syndrome. Our study found that the covariance components of structural and molecular neuroimaging underlying frontotemporal dementia clinical syndromes exist both as a continuum and with syndrome-specific patterns. More than one imaging model was able to correctly classify several frontotemporal dementia clinical syndromes with good specificity and sensitivity, highlighting the value of imaging in aiding patient diagnosis.
Reference Key
openalex_W7212191262 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Irene Sintini, Neha Atulkumar Singh, Farwa Ali, Joseph R. Duffy, Heather M Clark, Rene L. Utianski, Gabriela Meade, Mary M. Machulda, Ryota Satoh, Dennis W. Dickson, Val J. Lowe, Keith A. Josephs, Jennifer L. Whitwell
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Brain communications
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/braincomms/fcag341
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcag341
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.