What’s Old is New: How Anti-Trans Policy Mimics the Anti-Abortion Strategy that Culminated in Dobbs

Clicks: 14
ID: 328208
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #110 of 168 articles by views in Health Affairs Scholar

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 168 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Legislation restricting the rights of transgender people has increased dramatically in recent years. This trend echoes the historical arc of anti-abortion legislation. Over the 50 years between the Supreme Court decisions in Roe and Dobbs, anti-abortion advocates worked to erode abortion access by expanding both the volume and scope of legislative attacks. While many of the bills proposed prior to Dobbs were enjoined pending litigation, their overall effect was to chill provision of care, and propel a federal legal strategy that dismantled abortion access, paving the way for contemporary abortion bans. The anti-trans movement has followed the same playbook. In considering how to resist these assaults, the pro-abortion movement provides valuable lessons, both through an analysis of its strategic defeats, and of its post-Dobbs resilience. Advocates for trans rights must vigorously affirm the humanity of trans people, mobilize institutional support, and coordinate a strategic states-based defense to resist contemporary anti-trans legislation.
Reference Key
openalex_W7212127356 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Health Affairs Scholar
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/haschl/qxag249
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.