Contingent Trade Agreements: Linking Free Trade and Environmental Conservation

Clicks: 1
ID: 327996
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #267 of 268 articles by views in the economic journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 268 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract There appears to be a tension between trade proponents and environmental activists. This paper shows, however, how Contingent Trade Agreements (CTAs) can motivate conservation. I first analyse a standard trade model where trade-specific investments (e.g., deforestation) cause environmental damage and traditional trade agreements, including free trade, increase deforestation. Next, I define and analyse CTAs, where default tariffs vary with production capacity (e.g., forest cover). In equilibrium, countries conserve to maintain favourable terms of trade. The quantitative model shows that trade liberalisation can dramatically expand Brazil’s agricultural area, but this expansion is avoidable if the EU or US offers a CTA.
Reference Key
openalex_W7211876481 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Bård Harstad
Journal the economic journal
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ej/ueag109
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.