Themes of Incongruence in the Relationships between Care Partners and Care Recipients During Discharge from Hospital to Home

Clicks: 27
ID: 327916
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #100 of 197 articles by views in the gerontologist

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 197 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hospital-to-home transitions constitute vulnerable periods during which health systems increasingly rely on unpaid care partners to help care recipients execute discharge plans. We examine how mutuality and incongruence within care partner-care recipient dyads may shape discharge preparedness and dyadic self-efficacy during care transitions. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a secondary qualitative analysis of PROJECT ACHIEVE focus groups and key informant interviews with 248 participants (138 care recipients, 110 care partners) across six U.S. health systems, examining their experiences of hospital-to-home transitions. A multidisciplinary team conducted thematic analysis and compared themes across stakeholder groups, guided by Social Cognitive Theory and Interdependence Theory. RESULTS: Care recipients and care partners shared goals but often differed in their appraisals of discharge readiness and post-discharge roles. Three domains of incongruence emerged: (1) preparedness for transitions home, as care recipients prioritized going home despite ongoing symptoms while care partners worried about premature discharge and inadequate training; (2) burdensomeness and struggle for independence, as care recipients desired to preserve autonomy while care partners absorbed the emotional and practical strain of supporting such desires; and (3) role changes and evolving relational identities, as spouses and adult children assumed caregiving roles that disrupted prior identities in the relationship. Lower mutuality was linked to reduced dyadic self-efficacy and, consequently, increased risk of readmission. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings highlight dyadic incongruence as a target for intervention in care transitions. Care strategies that assess care recipient-care partner mutuality may enhance dyadic self-efficacy and improve post-discharge outcomes.
Reference Key
openalex_W7211940959 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Suzanne Mitchell, Sophia A Greisner, Maria DelPico, Yildirim H. Ozdemir, Kirsten Austad, Laird M Div Lance, Mark V. Williams, Brian W. Jack
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal the gerontologist
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/geront/gnag207
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnag207
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.