The integration of Artificial Intelligence with Multi-criteria Decision-Making/Aiding Methods: a systematic literature review

Clicks: 54
ID: 327615
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #2 of 19 articles by views in ima journal of management mathematics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Artificial Intelligence (AI) has advanced significantly in the 21st century, evolving into a crucial tool for decision-making. A prominent trend is its integration with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making/Aiding (MCDM/A) methods to support complex decisions across diverse engineering domains. This paper presents a systematic literature review analyzing 111 papers from scientific databases on integrating AI with MCDM/A methods. Unlike prior reviews that primarily catalogue methods or hybrid techniques, this study introduces a socio-technical analytical framework comprising three layers—technical configurations, functional mechanisms, and human–AI collaboration patterns—to explain how and why AI reshapes multicriteria decision processes. The findings reveal recurrent architectural patterns, identify dominant functional roles of AI across decision-process phases, and uncover an emerging shift from automation-oriented systems toward augmentation-based decision support. Rather than providing a purely descriptive mapping of the literature, this review undertakes an investigative task guided by a socio-technical framework. By examining how structural configurations of AI–MCDM/A integration reshape the stages of the decision process and redistribute roles between humans and AI, the study moves beyond cataloguing techniques to uncover underlying integration logics, structural tensions, and developmental trajectories. In doing so, it offers both a conceptual consolidation for scholars and a structured foundation for the design of next-generation, human-centered intelligent decision support systems (IDSS).
Reference Key
openalex_W7208736831 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal ima journal of management mathematics
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/imaman/dpag031
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.