Beyond Binary Measures: Introducing A Safety Net Hospital Index

Clicks: 17
ID: 327441
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #76 of 168 articles by views in Health Affairs Scholar

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 168 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Safety net hospitals (SNHs) disproportionately serve uninsured, Medicaid, and low-income Medicare patients, yet no universally accepted SNH definition exists. Existing binary measures frequently identify divergent hospital sets, creating research inconsistency and risking misaligned policy protections, concerns heightened by recent federal Medicaid cuts and site-neutral payment reforms. Methods Using Medicare cost report data for community hospitals, we introduce and validate a continuous, multidimensional SNH Index constructed as composite of Medicaid revenue share, uncompensated care burden, and low-income Medicare share. Results Hospitals in the highest SNH Index quartile had substantially lower operating margins (−2.0% vs. 3.1% in the lowest quartile), fewer days cash on hand (91 vs. 158 days), and higher rates of financial distress (36% vs. 21%). The SNH Index showed stronger correlations with financial performance than five binary SNH definitions and a proxy for MACPAC's Medicare Safety Net Hospital Index. Within each quartile, system-affiliated hospitals significantly outperformed independent hospitals financially. Conclusion These findings suggest that policies protecting SNHs should incorporate composite, burden-based measures, and account for system-level financial resources rather than relying on binary classifications alone.
Reference Key
openalex_W7207592571 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Fredric Blavin, Avani Pugazhendhi, Stephen Zuckerman, John Holahan
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Health Affairs Scholar
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/haschl/qxag240
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag240
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.