Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: perspectives of Canadian pathologists and genetic counselors.
Clicks: 239
ID: 32742
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
69.7
/100
239 views
163 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #2 of 3 articles by views in journal of community genetics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Universal screening of all newly diagnosed colorectal cancer tumors can identify individuals at high risk for Lynch syndrome (LS), a hereditary cancer syndrome predisposing carriers to increased risk of colorectal, endometrial, and other cancers. To inform planning of a universal tumor screening program for LS in our jurisdiction, we undertook online surveys of Canadian pathologists and genetic counselors to describe existing tumor screening programs. Online surveys were hosted on SurveyMonkey between October 2016 and March 2017. Fifty-three pathologists and 66 genetic counselors completed surveys (total n = 119). While attitudes towards tumor screening were positive, considerable variability was observed in the existence of tumor screening, test ordering criteria, and practices. Most respondents indicated consent was not obtained for tumor screening nor were educational materials provided to patients; however, opting out of additional mutation testing in the event of a positive tumor screen was endorsed. Results add to the growing literature on providers' perspectives on population-based tumor screening programs and inform ways to offer these. Findings highlight the need to develop methods of patient education that allow meaningful opt-out decisions. The variability we observed also suggests the need for national standards and guidance on tumor screening for LS.
| Reference Key |
dicks2019universaljournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Dicks, Elizabeth;Pullman, Daryl;Kao, Ken;MacMillan, Andrée;Simmonds, Charlene;Etchegary, Holly; |
| Journal | journal of community genetics |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1007/s12687-018-0398-9
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.