Microsporum canis Complex Infections in the United Arab Emirates: Clinical, Molecular, and Antifungal Susceptibility Profiles

Clicks: 4
ID: 327379
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #161 of 163 articles by views in medical mycology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 163 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Microsporum canis complex infections remain a major cause of pediatric dermatophytosis, yet molecular epidemiologic and antifungal susceptibility data from the Arabian Gulf are scarce, with no contemporary regional assessment since 1981-1988. We characterized the clinical, molecular, and antifungal susceptibility profiles of M. canis complex isolates in Abu Dhabi and assessed concordance between phenotypic and ITS-based identification. Fifty-two clinical dermatophyte isolates collected through passive surveillance at the UAEU Fungal Reference Laboratory (September 2024-December 2025) underwent phenotypic identification, ITS sequencing, and antifungal susceptibility testing (CLSI M38). Clinical data were available for 48 patients. ITS sequencing identified 47 isolates (90.4%) as M. canis and 5 (9.6%) as the M. audouinii clade, with phenotypic discordance in 9.6% of isolates (including one M. canis misidentified as Trichophyton rubrum). The cohort was predominantly pediatric (79.2% ≤12 years; 54.2% female). Tinea capitis predominated (60.4%), followed by tinea corporis (20.8%) and multifocal disease (16.7%). Cat exposure was reported in 50% and infected household contact in 27.1%. All isolates showed low MICs (terbinafine MIC₅₀/₉₀ 0.015/0.03; itraconazole ≤0.03/0.06; voriconazole ≤0.03/≤0.03; griseofulvin 0.125/0.25; fluconazole 4/8 µg/mL). Despite this, 81.2% (26/32) of patients with follow-up experienced treatment failure or recurrence, with no clear MIC-outcome association. This first molecular and antifungal characterization of M. canis complex infections in the UAE over three decades showed that ITS sequencing corrected phenotypic identification in nearly 10% of cases. High recurrence despite low MICs suggests limited predictive value of in vitro susceptibility, supporting species directed management, molecular confirmation, species-directed management, and One Health strategies.
Reference Key
openalex_W7204667460 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Febin Anes, Akela Ghazawi, Hari Pankaj Vanam, Dana Aljneibi, Mushtaq Khan, Fouzia Jabeen, Ahmed R. Alsuwaidi, Jens Thomsen, Mohammad AlBataineh, Stefan Weber, Connie Gibas, Nathan P. Wiederhold, Fatima Al Dhaheri
Journal medical mycology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/mmy/myag091
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.