A meta-ethnography of staff experiences of raising concerns about quality and safety in residential aged care
Clicks: 25
ID: 327222
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
7.2
/100
25 views
24 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #39 of 172 articles by views in the gerontologist
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 172 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Speaking up about quality and safety issues can protect older people and support learning in health and social care systems. In aged care, staff work in diverse roles to deliver care to residents with complex care needs. This meta-ethnography aimed to synthesise evidence on staff experiences of raising concerns about quality and safety in long-term residential aged care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We included qualitative studies examining staff experiences of speaking up, incident reporting, and whistleblowing. Five databases were searched. The seven phases of meta-ethnography were used to translate first and second order constructs into third order constructs and a line-of-argument synthesis. RESULTS: Thirteen articles of 11 studies were synthesised to reveal four third order constructs: 1. Sensemaking a concern, 2. Organisational cultures determine how they are voiced, heard and respond to, 3. Systemic resources shape and constrain possibilities for voicing, and 4. Normalisation of poor care and loss of moral agency in organisations that respond with indifference. Raising concerns was a dynamic, recursive process encompassing phases of recognising, voicing, and organisational responding. Where quality and safety issues were normalised, individualised, or met with limited action, staff described moral distress, disengagement, and, in some cases, exit from the organisation or sector. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Raising concerns in residential aged care is a dynamic process shaped by interrelated individual, organisational and systemic factors. Speaking up interventions need to go beyond skills training to address phases of recognising care quality issues and how organisations respond when they are raised.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7204952796
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Kate Churruca, Kristiana Ludlow, Karan Singh, Janet C. Long, Jane Graham, Louise A. Ellis, Maree Saba, Zoe Gonzales, Bree Wright, Sharon Rose Stoddart, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Sagda Osman |
| Journal | the gerontologist |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/geront/gnag214
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.