Management of secondary aorto-oesophageal fistula after aortic arch replacement: a case report without aortic reconstruction

Clicks: 14
ID: 327141
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #273 of 408 articles by views in European Heart Journal - Case Reports

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 408 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Secondary aorto-oesophageal fistula (AEF) after aortic aneurysm repair is a rare but clinically catastrophic complication. Conservative management is associated with an unacceptably high risk of mortality, primarily due to severe infections. Although definitive in situ aortic reconstruction may be curative, it is highly invasive and carries substantial perioperative morbidity and mortality, particularly in frail patients or those with established infection. This case report describes the successful treatment of a secondary AEF without aortic arch reconstruction, achieving durable long-term infection control. Case summary A 74-year-old man was referred to our hospital with haematemesis, and a pseudoaneurysm was identified at the distal anastomosis site following total aortic arch replacement. Emergency thoracic-endovascular-aortic-repair (TEVAR) was performed as a life-saving measure to achieve rapid haemostasis and stabilisation. One month later, persistent fever and a residual oesophageal perforation prompted oesophagectomy with omental flap placement, without aortic arch reconstruction. Gastric conduit reconstruction was performed 4 months after TEVAR. The patient has remained event-free for more than 1 year after the initial presentation and intervention. Discussion This case highlights the importance of an individualised treatment strategy for secondary AEF. In selected patients, infection control may be achieved without aortic arch reconstruction.
Reference Key
openalex_W7204793598 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal European Heart Journal - Case Reports
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ehjcr/ytag648
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.