Natural and artificial selection generate distinct cranial diversification pathways in bats and domestic dogs

Clicks: 17
ID: 327102
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #210 of 292 articles by views in international journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 292 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
How far can evolution push a complex structure before hitting developmental limits, and when can it break free to explore new forms? Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) represent the most extreme skull shape diversity generated within a single species through recent artificial selection, while neotropical leaf-nosed bats (Phyllostomidae) showcase the broadest craniofacial radiation in mammals, shaped over millions of years of natural selection. Because these contrasting systems belong to the same mammalian superorder, they provide an opportunity to test whether skull evolution is constrained by the same limits operating at short timescales, or whether adaptive radiations enable access to novel morphologies at macroevolutionary scales. Using three-dimensional geometric morphometrics of 33 canids (dog breeds and wild species) and 62 phyllostomid species, we mapped cranial variation across morphospace to assess disparity and modularity, and then compared the dominant directions of cranial shape variation between clades. Despite the overlap in morphospace for some bats and dogs, we found numerous examples of evolutionary novelty in bats, supporting the emergence of macroevolutionary innovation. Both clades varied along a primary axis of snout elongation and shortening, but with distinct outcomes: the slightly more modular canine skull was largely confined to a single dominant direction of variation, whereas phyllostomids dispersed along multiple axes while occupying regions inaccessible to dogs despite exhibiting stronger cranial integration. While artificial selection in dogs has produced much more disparity per unit of evolutionary time, natural selection in bats reveals repeated evolutionary innovations rather than constrained scaling. These results demonstrate that artificial selection may inflate variation along a constrained axis, while natural selection may allow structural innovation beyond the limits of microevolutionary change.
Reference Key
openalex_W7204748731 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal international journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/evolut/qpag151
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.