“The right to be heard: exploring epistemic injustice in dementia care. A qualitative study”

Clicks: 41
ID: 327073
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #36 of 195 articles by views in the gerontologist

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 195 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epistemic injustice, introduced by philosopher Miranda Fricker in 2007, refers to harm affecting individuals as knowers because of social prejudices and stereotyping. This leads to the partial or complete exclusion of certain individuals from knowledge building. People living with dementia are particularly vulnerable because cognitive impairments may reinforce assumptions about reduced credibility, marginalising their voices in clinical, social and family contexts and limiting opportunities to exercise epistemic agency. This research examines how people living with dementia experience epistemic injustice in everyday life and how it shapes their participation as knowers in clinical, social, and family contexts. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with a conversational approach was conducted. Participants (N = 15) with a dementia diagnosis were interviewed in their homes or nursing homes. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically to identify recurring patterns and meanings. RESULTS: Three interconnected domains were identified: epistemic marginalisation in clinical encounters, everyday negotiation of competence and agency, and epistemic invalidation and silencing in interpersonal relationships. Participants often perceived these experiences as appropriate or expected rather than unjust, reflecting internalised stigma. Many felt their perspectives were no longer recognised as valuable, leading to withdrawal from care and communication and fewer opportunities to contribute their knowledge. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Epistemic injustice extends beyond healthcare, affecting everyday and family interactions by progressively limiting opportunities for people living with dementia to participate as credible knowers. Its normalisation fosters self-silencing, perpetuating disempowerment and social exclusion.
Reference Key
openalex_W7204966582 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Lara Calabrese, Marco Brigiano, Martina Quartarone, Alice Annini, Elisa Ferriani, Stefania Martinelli, Lisa Bortolotti, Rabih Chattat
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal the gerontologist
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/geront/gnag219
URL
https://academic.oup.com/gerontologist/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/geront/gnag219/70896144/gnag219.pdf
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.