Testing for functional adaptation in a genital bone: baculum size, shape, and microstructure show little plastic response to mating across five rodent species

Clicks: 35
ID: 326925
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #16 of 43 articles by views in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Plasticity—the ability of a genotype to produce different phenotypes in response to environmental input—can provide insight into the mechanical forces experienced by biological structures. Bones are particularly plastic, remodeling in response to sustained and repetitive mechanical stress. In many mammals, males possess a bone in their penis called a baculum. Across species, its extreme morphological divergence suggests it undergoes recurrent adaptive evolution, and several studies have explicitly linked baculum size and shape to reproductive fitness. However, the precise functions of this bone remain largely unknown. Here we test whether copulation imposes mechanical loading sufficient to induce remodeling in the baculum. We compared bacula of mated vs. unmated males across five rodent species with divergent baculum morphologies and mating ecologies, using high-resolution morphometric analyses of size and shape, and synchrotron-enabled quantification of bone microstructure. We found no consistent effect of mating on size, shape, or microstructure of the baculum. These results suggest that copulation does not impose mechanical loads sufficient to induce remodeling in the baculum. More broadly, our findings indicate that the rapid evolutionary divergence of the baculum is unlikely to be enabled by plasticity associated with copulation.
Reference Key
openalex_W7205003993 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors C F Toney, N G Schultz, B Pomidor, J Taylor, J Andronowski, Matthew D. Dean
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/iob/obag043
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/iob/obag043
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.