Retirement, Economic Vulnerability, and Subjective Wellbeing: A 13-Year Panel Study from the UK

Clicks: 18
ID: 326798
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #3 of 9 articles by views in Work Aging and Retirement

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Retirement constitutes a major life transition with significant implications for wellbeing, yet whether economically vulnerable individuals benefit equally remains underexplored. Drawing on continuity theory, activity theory, and the job demands-resources (JDR) framework, this study develops competing predictions about how economic vulnerability shapes the relationship between retirement and wellbeing. We examine the relationship between retirement and subjective wellbeing among UK adults aged 50–75, and investigate whether low income, lack of pension coverage, and poor health alter these associations. We analyse 13 waves (2009–2022) of the UK Household Longitudinal Study, comprising 26,118 individuals and 180,848 person-years of observation. Fixed-effects regression models are employed to isolate within-person changes across the retirement transition. Results indicate that retirement is significantly associated with improved life satisfaction and reduced psychological distress. Contrary to continuity and activity theory, economic vulnerability did not weaken these beneficial effects. Low-income individuals experienced significantly greater improvements in both outcomes compared to their higher-income counterparts. Those without private pension coverage and those in poor health also demonstrated equal or larger wellbeing gains upon retirement. This is consistent with the JDR framework, which predicts that disadvantaged workers benefit most from exiting high-strain, low-reward employment. Robustness checks, including an absorbing-state retirement definition and the exclusion of COVID-19 pandemic waves, confirmed these patterns. This suggests that retirement may reduce wellbeing inequality, even though the vulnerable start at lower levels and differences persist after retirement. While timing is not explored, the economically vulnerable reap significant gains from retirement, and wellbeing should be part of discussions about longer working lives.
Reference Key
openalex_W7204478650 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Work Aging and Retirement
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/workar/waag013
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.