Attraction to water and polarization in dragonflies and damselflies along a light pollution gradient

Clicks: 19
ID: 326650
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #11 of 55 articles by views in behavioral ecology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Aquatic insects, like odonates, rely on polarized light as a visual cue to locate water bodies for reproduction. However, artificial polarization from light pollution can lead them into ecological traps. This study investigates odonate preference for polarized light cues compared to other sensory cues associated with water perception, and the effects of exposure to artificial polarization on their sensitivity to these cues. This study tests whether artificial polarization imposes a selective pressure that modifies odonate behavior and sensitivity to water and polarization signals. We predicted that odonate species in areas with higher light pollution would show a reduced preference for anthropogenic polarizing traps and an increased preference for natural water bodies. Our multiple-choice experiment revealed interspecific differences in cue attraction, with some species preferring polarizing traps while others favored water or color cues. Species attracted to the ecological light traps were always a subset of the total species present in each locality, indicating that most species are not attracted to ecological traps. Surprisingly, we found few significant differences in odonate behavior between polarization exposure categories, suggesting either weak selective pressure, prioritization of other sensory cues, or existing physiological-behavioral strategies that allowed them to avoid these ecological traps. We observed sex disparities in susceptibility to all experimental surfaces, with males showing greater attraction, potentially due to differences in habitat selection criteria. While evidence of strong selective pressure from light pollution is lacking, a reduction in light pollution near water bodies is needed to conserve odonates and aquatic insect populations.
Reference Key
openalex_W4399280875 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Valentina Sandoval‐Granillo, Angélica S. Ensaldo-Cárdenas, Bruce A. Robertson, Giovanna Villalobos-Jiménez, Alex Córdoba‐Aguilar
Journal behavioral ecology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/beheco/arag108
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.