Allometric above- and belowground biomass models for China's subtropical forests advance pan-tropical carbon assessments

Clicks: 12
ID: 326604
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #32 of 110 articles by views in journal of plant ecology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Accurate allometric models are essential for quantifying forest carbon sinks. China’s extensive subtropical forests lack reliable biomass models, limiting carbon estimation. Here, we developed improved above- and below-ground biomass models using 1,993 harvest-based records from 166 sites. Various biomass models were developed, incorporating tree diameter at breast height (D, in cm), tree height (H, in m), and wood density (ρ, in g cm−3). Model performance was rigorously evaluated against existing approaches using the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), mean percent bias (MPB), and mean absolute percent error (MAPE) at individual and plot scales. The optimal above-ground biomass (AGB, in kg) model, AGB = 0.0526 · (ρD2H)0.9891 (R2 = 0.96, RMSE = 62.18 kg, MPB = 2.06% and MAPE = 26.69%), and below-ground biomass (BGB, in kg) model, BGB = 0.0107 · (ρD2H)0.9803 (R2 = 0.90, RMSE = 13.96 kg, MPB = 6.84% and MAPE = 33.16%). Our AGB estimates showed superior accuracy to Chave et al.’s pan-tropical model, with lower systematic bias (MPB = -1.59% vs. 13.88%) and error (MAPE = 27.34% vs. 31.36%), particularly for trees with D < 100 cm (∼97% of total validation data). Root-to-shoot ratios differed between functional types (0.231 ± 0.084 for broadleaf versus 0.194 ± 0.062 for coniferous species) and shifted with spatial scale and soil type; the paired AGB–BGB equations improved belowground estimation relative to a single constant ratio. These models facilitate more robust pan-tropical carbon assessments, thus supporting informed forest management and global climate policy decisions, especially in regions previously understudied.
Reference Key
openalex_W7204564547 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Sheng Huang, Shuguang Liu, Tang Wen-xi, Yu Zhu, Shu-Qing Zhao
Journal journal of plant ecology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jpe/rtag196
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtag196
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.