Limited Added Value of Recall-Derived Dietary Variables for Cardiovascular Disease Classification in NHANES, 2007–2018
Clicks: 13
ID: 326379
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
3.6
/100
13 views
12 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #62 of 314 articles by views in american journal of epidemiology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 314 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Short-term recall-derived dietary variables may be relevant to cardiovascular disease, but their classification value after demographic, lifestyle, and clinical markers are observed is unclear in cross-sectional survey data. We analyzed pooled data from 34,388 United States adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2018, after excluding participants with missing outcome status or current pregnancy. The outcome was a self-reported cardiovascular disease composite defined from coronary heart disease, angina, myocardial infarction, or stroke. We evaluated 3 nested predictor blocks: demographic and lifestyle variables, clinical and laboratory variables, and recall-derived dietary variables. Logistic regression and histogram-based gradient boosting were assessed with 5-fold out-of-fold validation. Adding the clinical block produced the largest discrimination gain (∆ area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.031 for logistic regression and 0.032 for gradient boosting; both P <.001). Adding dietary variables after the clinical block produced a 0.002 gain in logistic regression and no material gain in gradient boosting (P = .219). Weighted logistic regression, subgroup, and repeated stochastic imputation sensitivity analyses preserved the same hierarchy. In this setting, recall-derived dietary variables added little classification information once clinical markers were available.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7204188798
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Pınar Erdoğan |
| Journal | american journal of epidemiology |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/aje/kwag195
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.