Consumers with Weaker Applications Are Less Receptive to Algorithmic Evaluation

Clicks: 20
ID: 326315
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #7 of 197 articles by views in journal of consumer research

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 197 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Many organizations are adopting algorithms for evaluating various consumer applications (e.g., loans, insurance). This research explores how consumers react to this practice, with the goal of understanding what leads some consumers to react more positively or negatively to being evaluated by an algorithm than others. In the context of consumers applying for access to valued services, opportunities, or benefits, applicant strength (i.e., how strong an applicant believes their case is based on the information they have about their standing) influences their reactions toward algorithmic versus human evaluation. Algorithmic evaluation will have a greater deterrent effect on weaker than on stronger applicants. This asymmetry is explained by weaker applicants’ stronger preference for characteristics of human evaluators, such as flexibility and leniency, that they believe may improve their chances of receiving a favorable outcome. Consumers’ preferences ultimately impact willingness to apply, such that using algorithmic evaluations disproportionally discourages weaker applicants from applying. This research contributes to the literature on consumer responses to algorithms by identifying applicant strength as a novel determinant and by extending the focus from algorithms as advisors to algorithms as evaluators of consumers.
Reference Key
openalex_W7204140072 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Qiao Liu, Gerald Häubl, Noah Castelo
Journal journal of consumer research
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jcr/ucag033
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucag033
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.