Human Capital and Developmental Strengths: Older Adults and the Implementation of Age-Friendly Community Initiatives

Clicks: 25
ID: 326274
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #90 of 196 articles by views in the gerontologist

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 196 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Discourse on age-friendly communities (AFCs) calls for the meaningful inclusion of older adults as partners and contributors to community-change processes. Nevertheless, there has been very little theoretical or empirical attention as to why older adults' involvement matters. Our study aimed to address this gap by exploring the strengths-based qualities that older adults bring as implementation actors in AFC initiatives. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of qualitative interview data from 23 older adults across four states in the United States about their experiences leading or partnering on the implementation of AFC initiatives (e.g., as an AFC committee chair or workgroup member). We engaged in iterative rounds of coding and analytic memo writing using abductive qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Three thematic categories emerged regarding qualities that older adults bring to AFC implementation processes: (a) accumulated knowledge of aging and the community (based on prior professional and life experiences, as well as long-time residency in the community), (b) continuity of specialized skills and abilities (such as volunteer management, integrative thinking, and entrepreneurial skills), and (c) values extension and congruence with the AFC initiative (valuing older adults and the community, as well as valuing the psychosocial opportunities of participation). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: We situate our findings within the broader theoretical concepts of human capital and developmental strengths. We discuss how these theoretical orientations can promote the design of more optimal opportunities for older adults' civic contributions through AFC initiatives, with strong potential to benefit individuals and communities alike.
Reference Key
openalex_W7203994016 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Emily A. Greenfield, Natalie Pope, Uri Amir-Koren
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal the gerontologist
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/geront/gnag202
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnag202
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.