Just Vapor? Zero-Nicotine E-Cigarette Marketing and Public Reactions on TikTok: Implications for Youth Appeal, Harm Perceptions, and Regulation

Clicks: 4
ID: 325877
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #78 of 125 articles by views in nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the society for research on nicotine and tobacco

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 125 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Nicotine-free ("zero-nicotine") vaping devices are marketed as alternatives to nicotine, yet their promotion with flavors and claims of non-addictiveness raise concerns for tobacco regulatory science. Such marketing may encourage youth initiation, transition to nicotine vaping, or co-use with nicotine or other substances. Little is known about these products' marketing and perceptions on social media popular among youth. This study examined marketing claims of zero-nicotine products and user reactions on TikTok. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative content analysis of 435 TikTok promotional videos (July 2023-July 2024) posted by five zero-nicotine brands. Videos were inductively coded to identify themes. User comments (N = 5,418) were analyzed using latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic modeling and Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner (VADER) sentiment analysis. RESULTS: Among promotional videos featuring zero-nicotine products, 48% were entertaining, 39% discussed quitting nicotine, 38% portrayed zero-nicotine products as a healthier alternative to nicotine vaping or smoking, and 26% included unverified or misleading claims about health benefits. Flavors appeared in 34% of videos, taste comparisons in 20%, and "natural ingredients" in 15%. LDA-detected themes in comments revealed mixed reactions: difficulties quitting nicotine, concerns about health effects of zero-nicotine products, and skepticism about their cessation effectiveness, alongside curiosity and interest in trying zero-nicotine products and their lower-risk perceptions, including among self-identified minors. CONCLUSIONS: Zero-nicotine products, though marketed for adult cessation, are promoted on TikTok with youth-appealing features alongside reduced harm messages. Findings highlight youth appeal, misperceptions of safety, and the need for research and regulatory attention to zero-nicotine products.
Reference Key
openalex_W7203942883 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Julia Vassey, Jennifer B Unger, Artur Galimov
Journal nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the society for research on nicotine and tobacco
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ntr/ntag184
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.