Comment on ‘Cost differences between psoriasis biologics: implications for the Irish High Tech Scheme’

Clicks: 2
ID: 325822
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Cost comparisons of psoriasis biologics rely on list prices, but confidential rebates can substantially alter real costs—often hidden even from prescribers. Ireland's Framework Agreement mandates a transparent 37% price cut plus 12.5% rebate once a biosimilar enters the market, but deeper discounts for Best Value Biologics stay confidential. European tendering data show actual discounts of 80–90% off list price, meaning cost-minimisation analyses using list prices alone risk misleading clinicians. This letter proposes an approach similar to that in Scotland or Denmark - sharing relative net-cost rankings with prescribers without disclosing confidential absolute prices.
Reference Key
openalex_W7203868313 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Sophie Diong, Niamh Kearney
Journal clinical and experimental dermatology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ced/llag368
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.