Transitions from Exclusive Cigarette Smoking to Dual or Exclusive ENDS Use: Changes in Nicotine Dependence and Use Patterns, PATH Study Waves 1-7 (2013-2023)

Clicks: 3
ID: 325616
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #114 of 122 articles by views in nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the society for research on nicotine and tobacco

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 122 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) can aid cigarette cessation in trials; however, in real-world cohorts, dual use is more common than switching to exclusive ENDS, raising questions about harm-reduction potential. We examined changes in Tobacco Dependence Index (TDI), smoking behavior, and ENDS use among exclusive smokers who transitioned to dual or exclusive ENDS use. METHODS: Adults in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (Waves 1-7) contributed adjacent wave-pair episodes (baseline and follow-up). Outcomes included change in TDI (defined as the maximum of the cigarette- or ENDS-TDI for dual users), follow-up cigarette- and ENDS-TDI, non-daily smoking, ≥50% cigarettes-per-day (CPD) reduction, daily ENDS use, and pickups/day and puffs/pickup. Weighted generalized estimating equations adjusted for baseline TDI, wave, and demographics. RESULTS: Relative to remaining smokers, adjusted change in overall TDI was -6.26 for dual users and -10.81 for exclusive ENDS switchers (both p < .0001). Reductions in cigarette-TDI were small and nonsignificant for dual users (-1.72) but substantially larger for exclusive ENDS switchers (-33.90). However, dual users were more likely than remaining smokers to become non-daily smokers (RR 3.85) and achieve a ≥50% CPD reduction (RR 2.65). At follow-up, exclusive ENDS switchers scored higher on ENDS-TDI (+18.49 points) but lower on cigarette-TDI (-33.97 points) than dual users, alongside higher daily ENDS use (RR 2.08) and pickups/day (IRR 1.47), with similar puffs/pickup. CONCLUSIONS: Exclusive ENDS switchers reported the largest dependence reductions, whereas dual users showed moderate overall reductions but little change in cigarette dependence, consistent with a behavioral pattern of supplementation.
Reference Key
openalex_W7203703670 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Grace S. Chung, Elizabeth Yakes Jimenez, Cindy K. Blair, Kenneth D. Ward
Journal nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the society for research on nicotine and tobacco
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ntr/ntag179
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.