Directional Biases in Morphological Evolution: Implications for Phylogenetic Models
Clicks: 2
ID: 325580
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
2 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #62 of 112 articles by views in systematic biology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Even in the era of large molecular datasets, morphological evidence makes an integral contribution to reconstructing evolutionary history. Whereas traditional phylogenetic methods treat all morphological characters as if they evolve in the same way, we introduce a new analytical framework that explicitly distinguishes transformational characters, which document variation in form, from neomorphic characters, which record the presence or absence of discrete traits. Using 69 datasets that span major groups of animals and other organisms, we show that transformational characters typically change twice as fast as neomorphic characters; and that losses of neomorphic features occur more than twice as frequently as gains. Evolutionary models assuming long-term equilibrium are violated in the majority of datasets, suggesting ongoing directional trends. Accounting for these asymmetries improves model fit and can substantially alter inferred evolutionary relationships, sometimes producing posterior samples that occupy distinct regions of tree space. These results provide broad empirical evidence for directional biases in morphological evolution, supporting the view that developmental and ecological constraints favour trait loss over gain. By explicitly distinguishing different types of morphological change, this framework enhances model realism, recovers different phylogenies, and opens new avenues for interpreting macroevolutionary dynamics.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7168436995
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Martin Smith, Bo Yang |
| Journal | systematic biology |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/sysbio/syag063
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.