Evaluating Phylogenetic Comparative Methods under Reticulate Evolutionary Scenarios
Clicks: 2
ID: 325530
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
2 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #40 of 112 articles by views in systematic biology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Phylogenetic comparative methods (PCMs) are widely used to study trait evolution. However, many evolutionary histories involve reticulate processes, such as hybridization, that violate core assumptions of these methods. In this study, we evaluate how such violations affect the performance of PCMs. In particular, we focus on ancestral character estimation, evolutionary rate estimation, and model selection. We simulate continuous trait evolution on various phylogenetic network topologies and assess the performance of PCMs that assume a bifurcating tree (i.e., major tree of the network) as the underlying model of evolution. We find that the performance of the tested PCMs was suboptimal. Using random forest, generalized linear models, and model-based clustering, we identified key factors contributing to these inaccuracies. Our results show that frequent and/or recent hybridization accompanied by one or more transgressive events and rapidly evolving traits (i.e., high evolutionary rate) lead to significant estimation error, especially with respect to rate estimation and model choice. These factors substantially shift trait values away from tree-based model expectations, leading to overall increased error in parameter estimates. Our study demonstrates cases in which PCMs that rely on trees are likely to misinterpret biological histories and offers recommendations for researchers studying systems with complex evolutionary histories.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7143506082
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Lydia Morley, Emma S. Lehmberg, Sungsik Kong |
| Journal | systematic biology |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/sysbio/syag064
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.