Extreme male reproductive skew limits effective population size in American Standardbred horses

Clicks: 1
ID: 324977
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #48 of 54 articles by views in journal of heredity

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Standardbred horses are widely used for harness racing in North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. In the U.S., two gaits (Pacers and Trotters) are genetically differentiated at a level typical for different horse breeds. We used the complete pedigree for all registered American Standardbred foals born 1970–2014 (>200 K Trotters and > 500 K Pacers) to calculate annual and lifetime reproductive skew and its consequences for the effective number of breeders per year (Nb) and effective size per generation (Ne). With rare exceptions, females can only produce 0 or 1 foal per year, which limits annual and lifetime variance in offspring number. These constraints do not apply to males: with humans (rather than horses) deciding who breeds with whom, and how often, the most prolific stud regularly sires well over 100 foals each year and often over 1000 across its lifetime. Male reproductive skew increased over time in both gaits, with the most prolific studs producing 20% or more of all foals sired by members of their birth cohort. Although each gait in the U.S. is represented by tens of thousands of adult horses at any given time, male Ne is typically in the low hundreds, which drives the overall Ne/N ratio to or below 0.01—a value often considered to be “tiny.” Ne/N ratios this low have rarely been reported for large mammals and generally are thought to apply primarily to some marine species with very high fecundity. When Ne/N is this low, even large populations can experience substantial erosion of genetic diversity.
Reference Key
openalex_W7118121407 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Robin S. Waples, ANAS MAHMOUD KHANSHOUR, E. Gus Cothran
Journal journal of heredity
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jhered/esag062
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.