Meta-analyses of dietary exposures must consider energy adjustment: recommendations from a meta-scientific review

Clicks: 64
ID: 324820
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #40 of 385 articles by views in american journal of epidemiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 385 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
In observational studies of dietary exposures, the energy adjustment strategy directly alters the effect being estimated. Adjusting for total energy intake or expressing the exposure as a percentage of total energy changes the estimated effect to a substitution. This meta-scientific review aimed to investigate the extent to which meta-analyses of dietary exposures have considered this challenge and whether they might inadvertently pool incomparable effects. We identified all meta-analyses examining the relationship between 1) saturated fat and cardiovascular disease, 2) fish and cardiovascular disease. For each, we examined the two most recent and two most cited meta-analyses, and their constituent studies. We extracted information on research aims, estimated effects, and interpretations. The eight meta-analyses collectively included 82 studies and 144 unique models. 82% (n = 119/144) of models estimated substitution effects, but this was rarely recognised or discussed. Only one meta-analysis explicitly considered the energy adjustment strategy, only to determine eligibility for a sub-group analysis. No meta-analyses acknowledged that they may have pooled estimates for different effects. Such inappropriately pooled estimates result in quantities with obscure interpretations. Based on our findings, we offer recommendations designed to improve the conduct of future meta-analyses and, consequently, the quality of evidence that informs dietary recommendations.
Reference Key
openalex_W7111369867 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Natalia Ortega, Peter W G Tennant, Darren C Greenwood, Octavio Pano, Christina C Dahm, Russell J de Souza, Daniel Borch Ibsen, Conor MacDonald, Deirdre K Tobias, Georgia D Tomova
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal american journal of epidemiology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/aje/kwag188
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag188
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.