Institutional Amnesia and Public Administration: Does History Repeat?
Clicks: 3
ID: 324801
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
3 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #23 of 39 articles by views in journal of public administration research and theory
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Existing research suggests that a lack of institutional memory causes history to repeat in problematic ways within public administration agencies. However, this claim has not been well supported by theory or data that illuminates the process and effects of history repeating. To remedy this, the nascent concept of institutional amnesia is presented here as a means of theorizing repetitions of public administrative history. A sequential explanatory mixed method research design uses quantitative survey data (n=1608) and qualitative interview data (n=75) generated in the public services of Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom to show how institutional amnesia can lead to the recycling of ideas and practices, the inefficient relearning of information seeking processes and the delivery of conducive decision-making environments that can help address historical problems. These findings draw attention to the fact that administrative history does indeed repeat in public agencies because of institutional amnesia, but that it does so in positive as well as negative ways.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7202300863
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Alastair Stark, Hridesh Gajural, Jack Corbett, Dennis Grube, Heather Lovell, R. H. SCOTT |
| Journal | journal of public administration research and theory |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/jopart/muag025
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.