Strategy and clinical outcomes of open surgical repair for adult Kommerell’s diverticulum: a retrospective cohort study and our 10-year experience

Clicks: 2
ID: 324662
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #7 of 79 articles by views in Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To report our strategy and outcomes in open surgically treating adult Kommerell's diverticulum (KD) over the past decade. METHODS: 44 patiens who underwent open surgical repair for KD at our institution between 2015 and 2024 were enrolled. Patients were classified as aneurysm group (n = 25, 56.8%) or dissection (n = 19, 43.2%) group. Depending on the position and pathology, 1 of 4 procedures was performed: (1) descending aorta replacement and aberrant subclavian artery reconstruction; (2) total arch and partial descending aorta replacement; (3) thoracoabdominal aortic replacement; or (4) total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk. Long-term prognosis and perioperative safety were analyzed. RESULTS: Early mortality and composite adverse events for the overall cohort were 13.6% and 20.5%, respectively, without significant differences between the aneurysm and dissection groups (8.0% vs 21.1%, P = 0.42; 16.0% vs 26.3%, P = 0.32). However, the dissection group had a higher rate of acute kidney injury (52.6% vs 20.0%, P = 0.02), longer mechanical ventilation (33.4 [13.2∼122.1] vs 14.2 [6.8∼22.7] h, P = 0.005), longer intensive care unit stay (5 [3∼10] vs 2 [1∼5] d, P = 0.001), and longer postoperative hospitalization (15 [14∼21] vs 10 [7∼18] d, P = 0.007). For the entire cohort, 5-year overall survival and freedom from aortic-related reintervention were 77.8% and 88.9%. Patients in the dissection group had significantly lower 5-year overall survival (61.2% vs 92.0%, P=0.022) and freedom from aortic-related reintervention rates (77.3% vs 100%, P=0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Open surgical strategy was selected arrording to the position and pathology of KD. Open surgery achieved acceptable early and long-term outcomes. Once KD progressed to dissection, the difficulty and risk of open surgery increased and the long-term prognosis was impaired.
Reference Key
openalex_W7202205614 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Bowen Zhang, Mingxin Xie, Yanxiang Liu, Han Li, Ruojin Zhao, Xiangyang Qian, Cuntao Yu, Yaojun Dun, Xiaogang Sun
Journal Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/icvts/ivag210
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.