Quality indicators for the care of children with CNS tumors: an international modified Delphi study
Clicks: 4
ID: 324568
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.9
/100
4 views
3 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #100 of 111 articles by views in Neuro-Oncology Advances
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the leading cause of cancer-related death among children and adolescents globally. Despite the complex and multidisciplinary care needed, there is limited evidence on standardized quality indicators (QIs) for pediatric neuro-oncology (PNO). Methods A modified Delphi process was conducted to develop consensus-based QIs for PNO. Candidate indicators were identified through a systematic review of published literature. After expert screening, indicators were evaluated by a multidisciplinary panel through two rounds of Delphi surveys. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement. A subsequent consensus meeting and tiering process were conducted to categorize the selected indicators. Results The systematic review identified 35 studies containing 124 relevant indicators; these were subsequently refined to 63 candidate indicators for evaluation in two Delphi surveys. Thirty-two experts from 5 specialties and 15 countries participated in the consensus process. A consensus was established that included that indicators would have the following 3 characteristics: reflect the continuum of PNO care, be continuous variables, and be feasible to measure across diverse resource settings. Through two rounds of Delphi surveys, a total of 48 indicators met the consensus threshold. Indicators were subsequently consolidated to 31, following discussion and merging of overlapping items. Final indicators were categorized into two sets: 19 core indicators and 12 extended indicators. Conclusions By providing a framework for evaluating quality across the continuum of PNO care, these indicators can aid benchmarking and guide quality improvement interventions. Prospective validation and assessment of their impact on patient outcomes are still needed.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7202131085
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sergio Licona, Syed Ahmer Hamid, Elizabeth Mutura, Alia Ahmad, Asim Bag, Simon Bailey, Ronnie E. Baticulon, Frederick Boop, Eric Bouffet, Dian Cahyanti, Omar Chamdine, Kenneth T E Chang, Gargi Das, Michael C Dewan, Rosdali Díaz-Coronado, Jen Chun Foo, Verónica Girón, Álvaro Lassaletta, John T. Lucas, Andres Morales-La Madrid, Regina M Navarro-Martin del Campo, Nuha Omran, Diana S. Osorio, Ibrahim Qaddoumi, Bilal Mazhar Qureshi, Noah D. Sabin, Hend Sharafeldin, Vijay Sundar, Santhosh A. Upadhyaya, Anna Vinitsky, Jefferson Wanyoike, Nuzhat Yasmeen, Daniel C. Moreira |
| Journal | Neuro-Oncology Advances |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/noajnl/vdag206
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.